Friday, March 14, 2014

Cameras in club premises

From:
Mrs. Deepa Tidke
Membership No. LT-1811
Date: 24th February, 2014
To,
1)    The Chairman,
      MIG Cricket Club,
      Bandra – E, Mumbai

2)    The Hon. General Secretary, MIG Cricket Club

3)    All the Trustee of the Club

4)    All the Members of the Managing Committee of the Club

Dear Sir,
Re. Cameras in the club premises

            The management has installed surveillance cameras all over the club premises without taking the members into confidence. Security considerations and police advisories necessitate the cameras being installed at the gate and in the club entrance door/s but during my last visit I saw cameras with voice recorders are installed in the bar, restaurants, card room etc. I do not know where else the cameras are placed. Many serious issues need to be resolved before the cameras are activated. The issues are:

1.     Members’ right to Privacy
2.     Misuse - any guarantee against?
3.     Licence to Spy?
4.     Monitoring person/s – Credibility?
5.     Misuse by vested interest
6.     Staff behavior – Scared - interaction with members lost
7.     Data Protection Act and Data Protection Rules
8.     RTI and the recorded data

Detailed note covering discussion on each of the points is attached.

Please note that privacy of the members should be protected and cannot be compromised. The security considerations ends at the gate as all the entrants are recorded. The Management cannot guarantee against the misuse or certifying credibility of the monitors and so mere assurances against such misuse would be worthless. The members wonder what advice was provided by the Legal Advisors of the management on the issues arising out of Data Protection laws and rules. I request you to put such advice, if availed, before the members.

I request you to put before the members in the ensuing AGM the justifications by the Board of Trustees (As all the capital expenditure is approved by the BOT) and total cost incurred on the same. I further request you reconsider the camera locations and remove all the cameras except those at the main gate and at the entrance doors of the club. Many members are expressed their concerns as written above.

Thanking you,
Yours sincerely,
  Deepa Tidke
     LT-1811

Note on the issues re. Surveillance Cameras at MIG Cricket Club

1.     Members’ right to Privacy

Conversation and photos of the members and their guests will now be recorded. Members’ interactions inter-se do not have any security considerations for the club. We have security guards to control any untoward stray instances.

Such data may result into moral policing and even blackmailing in future that the management cannot guarantee against.

The Supreme Court of India has held in a number of cases that the right to privacy is implicit in the right to life and personal liberty guaranteed to Indian citizens.

2.     Misuse - any guarantee against?

We have many lady members and as associate members. They have already started feeling uncomfortable being watched. The cameras in the lobby, gym, terraces used for dance/yoga/ aerobic classes, swimming pool and such places will record uncomfortable photos. The ladies do not want such photos being viewed by any including any trustee or any managing committee member in charge of the monitoring.

We regularly read reports of such photos going viral on social media and the consequent police cases. We do not want even creating any possibility in our club.   

There are allegations of betting being done in the Card room. Even assuming that it takes place as a stray instance, what is the guarantee is not selectively misused as evidence in complaints to police?

The Management cannot provide any guarantee against the misuse and mere words of assurance have no value.

3.     Licence to Spy?

I draw your attention to an interesting blog viz. “Licence to spyhttp://www.fsp-law.com/articles/licensed-to-spy-cctv-and-the-law

No additional comments are required. Recording of the conversations is most dangerous. The members fail to understand any purpose achieved by recording the conversations.

4.     Monitoring person/s – Credibility?

Even for the limited recordings at the gates, the members want to know the person who is authorized to view the recordings. He needs to be a person of highest character and credibility and without even any allegation of moral misconduct in the past.   

Let the members discuss each of the members of the Board of Trustees or of the Managing Committee for approval of the name. Credibility of such person is of most importance even when the cameras are restricted only to the gates. The members should be taken into confidence while selecting such person as their privacy is at stake. The Management cannot decide of its own on such sensitive issue.

5.     Misuse by vested interest

The data is liable to misused even for commercial interests or even for the club ‘politics’. What guarantee can be provided against such misuse? This is more so as even the conversations are being recorded.

It may lead in future for unpleasant cases and end up creating mistrust. Nothing is achieved for the Club’s security by recording the conversations.

6.     Staff behavior – Scared - interaction with members lost

The staff of the Club has already withdrawn from any conversation with the members fearing actions by the management, the fears founded or unfounded. I do not know whether it is the intended objective but this is the definite fall out.

Such atmosphere of mistrust is not good for the Club.

7.     Data Protection Act and Data Protection Rules

I draw your attention to the Data Protection Act and the Rules made thereunder. The provisions are stringent and any misuse will attract heavy punishment including imprisonment.  Members of the Managing Committee and the Trustee are sure to face the music in any case of misuse and any data security failure will be attributed to them being its custodian. 

The data, even of the recording at the gates, is required to be properly preserved and protected against unauthorized access or modification or deletion. What measures are in place for the it?

Moreover, such outright and unjustified breach of privacy of the members may struck down by court, putting the Club into avoidable legal expenses and loss of the expenses incurred on the cameras already procured. 

8.     RTI and the recordings

The Clubs are covered under RTI. Is the Club management prepared and ready to provide the camera recordings at the Card Room, bar etc. to any person? Let us not test the provisions of RTI. 

                                                                                                            Deepa Tidke
   LT-1811
24-2-2014




Letter to the Chairman, MIG Cricket Club, Bandra-E, Mumbai
Re. Cameras in the club premises – Letter dated 24th Feb., 2014


I support the issues as written in the letter referred above.

Sr. No.
Name of the Member
Membership No.
Member’s signature










































Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Extra-ordinary General Body Meeting held on 1-12-2013

Date: 5th Dec., 2013

To,
The Chairman,
MIG Cricket Club,
Bandra – East, Mumbai

Dear Sir,
Re. Extra-ordinary General Body Meeting held on 1-12-2013

This has reference to your SMS received yesterday wrongly claiming that the Annual Accounts of 2010-2011 were unanimously passed.

I had raised specific objections on certain issues that I had requested to put on records. Many people had said ‘No’ for passing of the accounts but the decent seem to be not taken into account. The points raised by me were:

1)      Invalidity of the passing of Annual Accounts by EOGM when it needs to be on the Agenda of AGM as per Clause 4.8 of the Club’s constitution

2)      a)         I have provided a proof of a receipt dated 30-12-1994 for Rs. 14,000 issued towards Ordinary Membership of the Club but that person’s name is not in the list of the members.

b)        This shows that the membership records are incorrect even since 1994. There may be many such instances.

c)         Thus, the Members Account including the corpus account need to be thoroughly investigated and certified by the Club’s statutory Auditors.

d)        Thus, all the subsequent year’s accounts are wrong as we do not even know whether the annual membership fee from that person is ever collected.

e)         This case is only as an example with solid proof and should form a basis for further investigation as I had claimed in the meeting.

3)      Without prejudice to the point no. (1) above, whether the accounts of 2010-11 are different than those put before the last AGM of the Club? If not what purpose is achieved in rejecting it earlier and then passing it? If they are different, no differences were pointed to the members.

4)      This has become a very disturbing precedent where AGM is bypassed for passing of Annual Accounts. The Office of the Charity Commissioner may reject the accounts and refuse to accept it unless approved by the AGM of the Club.

I am writing this letter to put my stand on record and request to record by dissent for passing of the accounts otherwise claimed as passed unanimously.

Thanking you,

Yours sincerely,

Deepa Tidke


LT-1811